Subject	Re: Aesthetically Blah
Posted by	RobZ32 on March 25, 2011 at 1:24 PM
	This message has been viewed 205 times.
In Reply To	Aesthetically Blah posted by Rob@DSH on March 25, 2011 at 11:37 AM
Message	Well while i agree that the italia in its original form its exquisite, this particular version was built with one thing in mind, function over form, and while visually it might not be as apealing as the original italia it will prove very capable at the track. Rob It's never "DONE", just finished enough to drive :-) - BigTDogg (MA)
Follow Ups	NZR Mansory does it Again!! - RobZ32 10:42:15 03/25/11 They sure do like destroying the way exotic cars look (n/m) - collegeboy 10:47:02 03/25/11 buzz buzzz (n/m) - Bernie (NoVA) 10:48:06 03/25/11 The 458's front nose was one of it's best features - RICH1 11:16:47 03/25/11 Aesthetically Blah - Rob@DSH 11:37:05 03/25/11 I Mean Honestly - Rob@DSH 11:40:22 03/25/11 Dislike door sking mounted mirrors - JMartz 12:18:16 03/25/11 SHOULD lower the price since they ruined a beautiful car IMO (n/m) - MrOzzie5183 13:11:18 03/25/11 Those headlights are hideaous - ZXRider 13:35:35 03/25/11 The 599 is a beautiful car as well... - Rob@DSH 13:44:26 03/25/11 2nd. The original looked great. This does not. (n/m) - CameronSF 13:18:22 03/25/11 Re: Aesthetically Blah - RobZ32 13:24:11 03/25/11 If you are purely after function not form, Ferrari is not... - Rob@DSH 13:50:45 03/25/11 louvers are making a comeback? IMHO they belong in the 70's (n/m) - Cap927(Boston) 11:39:28 03/25/11 Disco Disco!! Yeah Yeah!! (n/m) - BoneZ 13:39:42 03/25/11 Not feeling it. - sparkie 13:28:53 03/25/11 hm, color aside, I like both versions, but the OEM version - LJZTT 13:37:19 03/25/11 Some companies need to keep their hands off perfection! (n/m) - ELIM 13:38:17 03/25/11 Fugly, but I'm sure it flies. (n/m) - BigTDogg (MA) 14:08:08 03/25/11 well they ruined that poor car (n/m) - Antihero 16:30:07 03/25/11 Lamborghini believes every part,curve should have a function - TTkeeper 17:25:40 03/26/11
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.